Quality indicators for general practice: which ones can general practitioners and health authority managers agree are important and how useful are they?

نویسندگان

  • S M Campbell
  • M O Roland
  • J A Quayle
  • S A Buetow
  • P G Shekelle
چکیده

BACKGROUND The aim of the study was to assess the face validity of quality indicators being proposed for use in general practice by health authorities. METHOD A national survey of health authorities was carried out to identify quality indicators being proposed for use in general practice. A two-stage Delphi process was used to establish general practitioners' (GPs') and health authority managers' views on the face validity of identified indicators. A total of 240 separate indicators identified by health authorities and the NHS Executive as potential markers of the quality of general practice care were assessed. Indicators related to access, organizational performance, preventive care, care for a small number of chronic diseases, prescribing and gatekeeping. The subjects were a purposive sample of 47 health authority managers and 57 general practice course organizers. RESULTS Thirty-six indicators received median validity scores of 8 or 9 out of a maximum possible score of 9. Of this set, 83 per cent was rated identically by both groups of respondents. Prescribing and gatekeeping indicators generally received low validity scores. CONCLUSION Acceptable face valid indicators were identified for all domains except gatekeeping. However, the indicators rated by the sample do not cover all aspects of care. No indicators were proposed for use by health authorities relating to effective communication, care of acute illness, health outcomes or patient evaluation. Although it is possible to develop indicators of general practice care which have face validity in the view of both GPs and managers, these will be very partial measures of quality. In the indicators used in this study, no explicit distinction was made between indicators designed to assess minimum standards with which all practices should comply, and indicators which could be used to reward higher levels of performance. Failure to separate these will result in antagonism from practitioners to quality improvement initiatives in the NHS, and a failure to engage the profession in improving quality of care.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Radioiodine and thyroid eye disease.

1 NHS Executive. The new NHS: a national framework for assessing performance. London: Department of Health, 1998. 2 Bindman A B, Grumbach K, Osmond D, Komarony M, Vranizan K, Lurie N, et al. Preventable hospitalisations and access to health care. JAMA 1995;274:305-11. 3 Reid FDA, Cook D, Majeed FA. Variation in hospital admission rates between general practices: cross sectional study. BMJ 1999;...

متن کامل

The Royal College of General Practitioners Policy Statement Quality Indicators in General Practice

• Measurement has a high profile in modern health care systems because it can facilitate greater accountability and help to improve quality. • Some aspects of general practice care can be measured with greater validity and reliability than others-sometimes meaning some important areas are overlooked. • There are some significant conceptual and practical problems with using quality indicators in...

متن کامل

Appropriate prescribing in general practice: development of the indicators.

Of all the activities that take place in general practice, prescribing has the greatest potential to produce health benefits or to cause harm. Therefore, indicators of appropriateness of prescribing should have a central place in evaluating the performance of general practitioners and encouraging improvements in the quality of care. It is surprising, therefore, that little research has been don...

متن کامل

General practitioner reaccreditation: use of performance indicators.

There has been increasing debate about reaccreditation of general practitioners over the last few years with contributions from the General Medical Services Committee, the Royal College of General Practitioners and the National Association of Health Authorities and Trusts. The implications of proposals in terms of cost, logistics and organization are discussed in this paper, in light of experie...

متن کامل

Misconduct in Research and Publication

Dear Editor, I read the recent publication on “Misconduct in Research and Publication” with great interest[1]. I agree that misconduct in research and publication is not uncommon. Nevertheless, it is rarely mentioned. In fact, there are many incorrect conceptions among researchers on publication ethics. The milder examples are attempts to report only the “positive outcomes&rdq...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of public health medicine

دوره 20 4  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1998